Trump Threatens to Pull Plug on $16 Billion Gateway Tunnel, Schumer Digs In

New York’s most critical rail link is suddenly hostage to federal politicking, threatening the economic lifeblood of the entire Northeast Corridor.

At sunrise on Manhattan’s West Side, jackhammers echo underneath Tenth Avenue as crews inch forward on one of the nation’s most complex infrastructure puzzles. Across the Hudson, in North Bergen, engineers oversee the boring of two gaping, unfinished holes, the would-be portals of the $16bn Gateway Project—the city’s most expensive, and arguably most vital, public works undertaking in decades. But as of this week, that future is imperilled: President Donald Trump has announced his intention to “terminate” the gargantuan federal investment underpinning the project, leaving, in his words, “holes in the ground” marooned on both banks of the river.

The move, delivered from the Oval Office amidst an ongoing government shutdown, marks the sharpest federal rebuke yet to Gateway: the 109-year-old rail tunnels bi-secting the Hudson serve 200,000 daily riders and underpin $20bn in annual economic activity. In a feat of reverse grandstanding, Mr. Trump’s announced withdrawal torpedoes $6.8bn in federal grants pledged under President Joe Biden—a sum notable as the largest single federal transit investment in US history. Even for a city jaded by whimsy out of Washington, the spectacle is breathtaking.

The implications for New York’s commuters are not academic. Without the Gateway tunnels, Amtrak and NJ Transit must continue to funnel every train into Manhattan through decaying infrastructure built in 1910. Repeated warnings from engineers—backed by a 2019 Amtrak report noting the tunnels’ “urgent need” for repair—portend that without substantial intervention, catastrophic failures are merely a matter of time. Schumer, New York’s perennial Senate Democrat, voiced consternation: “It’s going to screw over hundreds of thousands of commuters,” he said, accurately capturing the unvarnished mood of the tri-state region.

The crisis is not merely one of transport: it is a contest of economic consequence. Every morning, workers from New Jersey, Long Island, Westchester, and beyond course into Manhattan’s Midtown, feeding the city’s $1trn regional economy. Reliable cross-Hudson transit is the circulatory system powering Wall Street, Silicon Alley, and the real estate market. Subtract the Gateway tunnels and the region would forfeit vital artery flow, with ripple effects across the mid-Atlantic. Even a short-lived construction halt, analysts warn, would drive up costs and hammer private contractors, both union and non-union.

Yet the grudge match now playing out has less to do with the arcana of rail boring than with broader skirmishes over policy prerogatives and patronage. The latest escalation, orchestrated by budget director Russ Vought, targets $18bn in federal transit grants linked to New York’s affirmative-action requirements for public contracts—the state mandates a share for women- and minority-owned businesses. The White House insists such contracting quotas presumptively disadvantage others, proposing a rewiring of the rules to require “race- and sex-neutral” contracting reviews nationwide.

Should Mr. Trump’s protestations gain traction, the Gateway fiasco could portend a chilling precedent for other blue-state megaprojects across America. Already, officials fret that major builds—from California’s bullet train to Boston’s North-South Rail Link—risk federal torpedoes unless they conform to the shifting sands of Washington’s ideological winds. In practical terms, New York remains particularly exposed: for more than a century, it has built big with federal dollars, offsetting steep local debt and soaring construction costs through vigorous advocacy on Capitol Hill.

Losing steam along the Northeast Corridor

Even by the standards of American infrastructure dysfunction, the cross-river drama stands out. Europe’s reliance on heavy rail—exemplified by the Channel Tunnel or Germany’s ICE network—offers a sobering point of comparison. There, party-political skirmishes rarely derail essential capital programs. In Japan or France, the notion of suspending work on a critical link connecting the nation’s financial heart to the rest of the country would be met with incredulity.

For the workers on both sides of the Hudson, progress continues—at least for now. Amtrak, the national rail operator and technical steward of the tunnels, signals that construction remains underway, contracts signed and agreements inked. Carlo Scissura, who leads the New York Building Congress, is less sanguine, warning of “paltry certainty” for hundreds of contractors whose livelihoods could be derailed by a change in the administration’s mood. Funding agreements, he notes, are signed by the very Department of Transportation currently threatening them.

Optimists will mutter that this, too, shall pass. The region boasts an unrivalled record of bulldozing through setback after federal setback. But the stakes this time are unusually severe: the cost of delay has been estimated at $1.3m daily, while previous attempts at cross-Hudson tunnels famously resulted in the ghostly “arc holes” left behind when Chris Christie cancelled a predecessor project in 2010. History threatens to repeat itself with exquisite irony.

In a nation increasingly given to parochial grievance and short-term manoeuvring, the fate of the Gateway tunnels is a litmus test for America’s ability to build at scale for a shared future. The classical-liberal principle—that public works, though a public good, demand political compromise—is sorely tested when technical necessity collides with ideological hostility. Nowhere is that tension starker than in New York, where functional transit more than any one mayor or president underwrites the city’s world standing.

The spectacle unfolding at the banks of the Hudson is no mere local squabble, but a proxy for the American predicament itself. As construction cranes idle and lawsuits loom, the choice is stark: invest in tomorrow’s backbone, or let the petty vendettas of today hollow out the nation’s most critical artery. On the evidence at hand, we remain cautiously sceptical.

■